A living digital archive

Earth Remembered

Hand-drawn testimonies of environmental and climate change, gathered in the field — starting in Salento and reaching outward into the rest of the world — each pair holding an emotional childhood place as it was remembered, and as it looks now. Some of what changed is the climate itself; just as often, it is the anthropogenic hand of development, tourism, farming, or a city’s growth.

terra memoranda · every drawing is one witness; together they draw one earth in change

Remembered, twice over: a journey back through the memories and emotions a place still holds — and a reminder, too — to remember the earth, and not look away from what we are doing, and what is happening, to her.

The premise

Twenty-eight drawings, so far. Fourteen starting in Salento, fourteen carried back from elsewhere in the world — deserts, coastlines, rivers, groves, city parks, an old quarry, a derelict fortress wall. No single logic ties them together except the one that matters: someone was asked to draw an emotional place from their childhood, as they remember it, and to draw it again as it looks now.

Participants at a table drawing their childhood places in pencil and colour, surrounded by library shelves
Turning a childhood memory into pencil and colour, at the first workshop.

The aim

The aim is twofold, and neither half is secondary. As a project, it is meant to become a rigorous, citable record of environmental and anthropogenic memory across cultures — testimony gathered in the field, attributable and comparable, useful to research long after any one contributor’s own memory of the place has faded. And as something to sit with, it is meant to make that change felt, not only documented — so that whoever scrolls through it leaves not just informed, but moved enough to remember the earth themselves, and not look away from what is happening to her.

Two participants filling in a colourful drawing of a flower meadow with coloured pencils, a box of Alpino pencils on the table
Filling in the colour and detail of a remembered place, pencil by pencil.

How this began

This archive began as a community workshop I ran in Salento, in May 2026, part of my research into how people experience and perceive anthropogenic climate and environmental change. The participatory drawing method itself grew out of that workshop, shaped by feedback from artists, andragogy specialists, psychologists, and anthropologists. It was only once the first drawings were in front of me that I saw how far this could reach beyond Salento — into a living, global archive able to hold the intricate, tangled complexity of change, and make it felt rather than just explained. That shift, from a single person's drawing to a living, collective record, took its cue from Forma Fluens, by Mauro Martino, and the way it lets many individual traces accumulate into one flowing, felt whole.

Overhead view of workshop participants seated in a circle of tables in a library, drawing and talking together
The community workshop in Salento, May 2026 — where the method behind this archive first took shape.
A long table crowded with participants drawing, pencils, and finished sketches of trees, rivers and mountains
The Baltic Summer School of Ethnography — Antalieptė, Lithuania, June 2026. Around the tables, pencils and drawings-in-progress.

Why drawing

Why drawing, and not a photograph or an interview alone? Partly because it asks something words don’t: for a few minutes, the person drawing becomes a child again, judgment suspended, reaching for a freer and more honest form of expression, without the fear of getting it wrong. Partly because memory itself is rarely made of facts — it’s made of sensations, smells, a particular light, the physical feel of a place — and a drawing can hold onto those without paraphrasing them into something else, showing them closer to how they were actually lived. And partly because setting a childhood place beside its present self, in just a few strokes, makes the emotional shape of the change visible before a single word of testimony is read.

A workshop participant holding up his drawing and speaking into a microphone, telling the group the story behind it
Telling the story behind a drawing is as much a part of the archive as the drawing itself.

Two states, not three

The archive asks for two states only, then and now, and never a third. Not because the future doesn’t matter, but because it isn’t the archive’s to draw — no one asked to depict a childhood place could draw its future from memory, only from imagination, and this project asks people to be rigorous about exactly one thing: what they actually remember, and what they can actually see today. The future is left open on purpose. It isn’t what the two dimensions record; it’s what they’re meant to provoke — a question raised by holding then and now side by side, rather than an answer supplied: what kind of future do we want, once we’ve looked honestly at what has already changed? The archive doesn’t settle that question. It is built to invite it — discussion and reflection, not conclusions.

Overhead view of a small round table with four participants drawing, phones and coloured pens scattered between the sketches
First the drawing, then the story behind it — written down before its “today” match exists.